2382 international gender division of labor

REFERENCES AND SUGGESTED
READINGS

Bengtson, V. L. (1975) Generation and Family
Effects in Value Socialization. American Sociologi
cal Review 40: 358 71.
Bengtson, V. L. (2001) Beyond the Nuclear Family:
The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational
Bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family 63: 1 16.
Bengtson, V. L., Biblarz, T. J., & Roberts, R. E. L.
(2002) How Families Still Matter: A Longitudinal
Study of Youth in Two Generations. Cambridge
University Press, New York.
Bianchi, S. M. (2000) Maternal Employment and
Time with Children: Dramatic Change or Surpris-
ing Continuity? Demography 37: 401 14.
Biblarz, T. J. & Raftery, A. E. (1999) Family Struc-
ture, Educational Attainment, and Socioeconomic
Success: Rethinking the Pathology of Matriar-
chy. American Journal of Sociology 105(2): 321 65.
Caplow, T., Bahr, H. M., et al. (1982) Middletown:
Fifty Years of Change and Continuity. University of
Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Cherlin, A. J. & Furstenberg, F. F. (1986) The New
American Grandparent: A Place in the Family, A
Life Apart. Basic Books, New York.
Silverstein, M. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.) (2005) Annual
Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 24:
Intergenerational Relations Across Time and Place.
Springer, New York.
Silverstein, M., Conroy, S., Wang, H., Giarrusso,
R., & Bengtson, V. L. (2002) Reciprocity in Par-
ent Child Relations Over the Adult Life Course.
Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 57: S3 S13.
Treas, J. (1995) Older Americans in the 1990s and
Beyond. Population Bulletin 50(2). Population
Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.

international gender
division of labor

Christine E. Bose

World systems theorists were among the first to
use the concept of an international division of
labor by illustrating how the production of
goods and services for core or more developed
countries relied on the material resources of
peripheral or developing nations (Wallerstein
1974). Their work describes the changing

political and economic relationships among
nations over the last six centuries, beginning
with the period of colonization when Western
European nations took possession of other coun
tries in order to gain access to their raw materials
such as sugar, coffee, gold, silver, or labor sold
into slavery. By the middle of the twentieth
century most of those colonies had gained their
political freedom and titular control over their
own resources, but were never able to break
away from their economic dependence on highly
industrialized countries.
In the twentieth century a new process called
global or economic restructuring created a new
form of international division of labor between
the developed countries (now labeled the global
North, a term replacing the old Cold War label
First World) and the developing nations
(now called the global South, which replaced
the concept of a Third World). Beginning in
the 1970s, in order to lessen production costs
and enabled by improvements in information
and production technologies, US, Japanese, and
Western European corporations began to off
shore some of their production processes to the
global South, often moving to export processing
zones (EPZs) within these countries, which are
defined as industrial zones that provide manufac
turing infrastructure, tax reductions, low labor
costs, lax environmental regulations, and other
incentives. As a result of this worldwide eco
nomic restructuring, much basic manufacturing
and heavy industrial production were relocated
to developing nations, while corporate head
quarters, service work, and final product finish
ing stayed in developed nations. This process
was initially referred to as the growth of the
global assembly line or the global factory (Kamel
1990). Instead of taking raw material resources
from their former colonies, transnational cor
porations (TNCs) based in the global North rely
on residents of the global South to provide inex
pensive labor for factories now located in devel
oping countries.
In addition, international development or
funding agencies such as the International
Monetary Fund and the World Bank influence
global South economies when they loan money
to poor and developing nations, because loans
are tied to required austerity measures known
as structural adjustment programs (SAPs).
SAPs require the debtor countries to reduce